Respiratory viral infection promotes the awakening and outgrowth of dormant metastatic breast cancer cells in lungs (preprint)

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer globally. Most deaths from breast cancer are due to metastatic disease which often follows long periods of clinical dormancy1. Understanding the mechanisms that disrupt the quiescence of dormant disseminated cancer cells (DCC) is crucial for addressing metastatic progression. Infection with respiratory viruses (e.g. influenza or SARS-CoV-2) is common and triggers an inflammatory response locally and systemically2,3. Here we show that influenza virus infection leads to loss of the pro-dormancy mesenchymal phenotype in breast DCC in the lung, causing DCC proliferation within days of infection, and a greater than 100-fold expansion of carcinoma cells into metastatic lesions within two weeks. Such DCC phenotypic change and expansion is interleukin-6 (IL-6)-dependent. We further show that CD4 T cells are required for the maintenance of pulmonary metastatic burden post-influenza virus infection, in part through attenuation of CD8 cell responses in the lungs. Single-cell RNA-seq analyses reveal DCC-dependent impairment of T-cell activation in the lungs of infected mice. SARS-CoV-2 infected mice also showed increased breast DCC expansion in lungs post-infection. Expanding our findings to human observational data, we observed that cancer survivors contracting a SARS-CoV-2 infection have substantially increased risks of lung metastatic progression and cancer-related death compared to cancer survivors who did not. These discoveries underscore the significant impact of respiratory viral infections on the resurgence of metastatic cancer, offering novel insights into the interconnection between infectious diseases and cancer metastasis.

COVIDFast™: A high-throughput and RNA extraction-free method for SARS-CoV-2 detection in swab (SwabFAST™) or saliva (SalivaFAST™) (preprint)

ABSTRACT There is an urgent need of having a rapid, high throughput, yet accurate SARS-COV-2 PCR testing to control the COVID19 pandemic. However, the RNA extraction step in conventional PCR creates a major bottle neck in the diagnostic process. In this paper we modified the CDC COVID-19 assay and developed an RNA-extraction free RT-qPCR assay for SARS-CoV-2, i.e. COVIDFast ™ . Depending on sample types, the assay is further divided into SwabFAST ™ , which uses anterior nares nasal swab, and SalivaFAST ™ , which uses saliva. By utilizing the proprietary buffer for either swab or saliva samples, the performance of SwabFAST or SalivaFAST is equivalent to RNA-extraction SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR in both contrived and clinical samples. The limit of detection of either assay is 4 copies/μL. We further developed a semi-automatic system, which is easy to adapt by clinical lab for implementation of a high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 test. Working together with the COVIDCheck Colorado, we have tested over 400,000 samples using COVIDFast (83.62% SwabFAST and 16.38% SalivaFAST) in less than a year, resulting in significant clinical contribution in the battle against COVID-19 during the pandemic.

SARS-CoV-2 viral load monitoring by extraction-free testing of saliva (preprint)

Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) remains the foundation of SARS-CoV-2 testing due to its accessibility, scalability, and superior assay performance. Variability in specimens and methods prevent standardization of RT-qPCR assays and reliable quantitative reporting to assess viral load. We developed an extraction-free RT-qPCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva and monitored viral load until convalescence in COVID-19 patients. Comparison of 231 matched anterior nares swab and saliva specimens demonstrated that extraction-free testing of saliva has equivalent analytical and clinical assay performance compared to testing of RNA extracts from either anterior nares or saliva specimens. Analysis of specimen pairs revealed higher viral loads in the nasal cavity compared to the oral cavity, although this difference did not impact clinical sensitivity for COVID-19. Extraction-free testing of a combination specimen consisting of both nasal swab and saliva is also demonstrated. Assessment of viral load by RT-qPCR and parallel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) revealed that cycle threshold (Ct) values less than approximately 30 correlated well with viral load, whereas Ct values greater than 30 correspond to low viral loads <10 copies/{micro}L. Therefore, extraction-free saliva testing maximizes testing efficiency without compromising assay performance and approximates viral loads >10 copies/{micro}L. This technology can facilitate high-throughput laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2, monitor viral load in individual patients, and assess efficacy of therapies for COVID-19.